Shocking Rebellion – Blue State Voters Defy Governor’s Soft-on-Crime Agenda

game over neon sign on brick wall.
Vector realistic isolated neon sign of Game Over logo for decoration and covering on the wall background. Concept of gaming.

California voters overwhelmingly approve Proposition 36, defying Governor Newsom’s opposition and signaling a seismic shift in the state’s approach to crime and punishment.

At a Glance

  • Proposition 36 passed with over 70% support, toughening penalties for serial theft and fentanyl dealing
  • The measure allows prosecutors to bypass the $950 theft threshold, making repeat offenses felonies
  • It introduces “treatment-mandated felonies,” offering rehabilitation options for certain offenders
  • Critics argue it could lead to increased incarceration and reduced funding for treatment programs
  • Governor Newsom opposes the measure, warning of a return to mass incarceration

California’s Tough-on-Crime Referendum

In a resounding rebuke to soft-on-crime policies, California voters have decisively passed Proposition 36, a measure aimed at cracking down on repeat offenders and drug dealers. With over 70% approval, the proposition signals a clear mandate for stricter law enforcement and a rejection of the permissive approach championed by progressive politicians.

The overwhelming support for Proposition 36 comes as no surprise to those who have witnessed the surge in crime across the Golden State. Retail theft, commercial robberies, and burglaries reached their highest levels in two decades in 2023, while the statewide clearance rate for thefts plummeted to a dismal 8%. This rampant lawlessness has left citizens feeling unsafe and demanding action.

Cracking Down on Repeat Offenders

One of the key provisions of Proposition 36 is its focus on repeat offenders. The measure allows prosecutors to bypass the $950 theft threshold established by the ill-conceived Proposition 47, making any theft a felony if the offender has two or more prior convictions. This change addresses a glaring loophole that has allowed career criminals to continually victimize law-abiding citizens and businesses with impunity.

“WE HAD INDIVIDUALS IN OUR CITY WHO WERE ARRESTED OR CITED OVER 15, 20, 25 TIMES IN A PERIOD OF 24 MONTHS,” – SAN JOSE MAYOR MATT MAHAN

Mayor Mahan’s statement underscores the frustration felt by local officials who have been hamstrung by weak laws and a revolving-door justice system. Proposition 36 gives law enforcement the tools they need to keep repeat offenders off the streets and protect our communities.

Tackling the Fentanyl Crisis

Another crucial aspect of Proposition 36 is its hard-line stance on fentanyl-related crimes. The measure imposes harsher punishments for dealers, including mandated prison time and potential murder charges for overdose deaths. This approach recognizes the devastating impact of the fentanyl epidemic and sends a clear message that those who profit from this deadly trade will face severe consequences.

“The passage of Proposition 36 reflects Californians’ strong desire for safer communities and meaningful solutions to our state’s rising crime, drug addiction, and homelessness crises.” – Yes on Proposition 36 campaign

While critics argue that the measure could lead to increased incarceration, supporters rightly point out that it also includes provisions for rehabilitation. The introduction of “treatment-mandated felonies” allows judges to mandate treatment for individuals with multiple drug charges, offering a path to recovery for those willing to change their ways.

Newsom’s Waning Influence

Perhaps the most telling aspect of Proposition 36’s passage is the clear rejection of Governor Gavin Newsom’s stance on crime and punishment. Despite Newsom’s vocal opposition to the measure, California voters chose overwhelmingly to support tougher penalties and increased accountability for criminals.

“Prop. 36 takes us back to the 1980s, mass incarceration, it promotes a promise that can’t be delivered. I would ask those who support it, particularly mayors: Where are the treatment slots, where are the beds? Twenty-two counties don’t have one residential treatment facility. Twenty-two counties don’t have one. I mean, they’re lying to you.” – Gov. Gavin Newsom

Newsom’s fearmongering about a return to mass incarceration fell on deaf ears as Californians, fed up with rampant crime and ineffective policies, chose to prioritize public safety over misguided notions of criminal justice reform. This resounding defeat for Newsom’s soft-on-crime agenda should serve as a wake-up call to progressive politicians who have consistently put the interests of criminals ahead of law-abiding citizens.

A Mandate for Change

The overwhelming support for Proposition 36 sends a clear message: Californians are demanding real solutions to the crime crisis plaguing their state. By approving tougher penalties for repeat offenders and drug dealers while also providing options for rehabilitation, voters have chosen a balanced approach that prioritizes public safety without abandoning the possibility of redemption for those who truly seek it.

As California moves forward with implementing Proposition 36, it’s crucial that state and local officials respect the will of the voters and work diligently to ensure that the measure’s provisions are fully enacted. The safety and security of our communities depend on it.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR