Candace Owens’ conspiracy theory implicating the U.S. military in Charlie Kirk’s assassination raises more questions than it answers.
Story Overview
- Candace Owens claims U.S. military involvement in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
- Owens’ allegations lack publicly available evidence and face significant backlash.
- Turning Point USA invites Owens for a public rebuttal to address her claims.
- The narrative contributes to a broader pattern of escalating conspiracy theories.
Owens’ Allegations and Their Impact
Candace Owens, a conservative commentator known for her provocative rhetoric, has introduced a conspiracy theory suggesting that the U.S. military was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This claim is the latest in a series of unfounded allegations linking Kirk’s death to various actors, including foreign governments. Despite the sensational nature of these claims, they remain unsupported by any credible evidence, drawing criticism from Charlie Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA, and other commentators.
Owens has previously accused Turning Point USA insiders, foreign governments such as France and Israel, and even suggested connections with Egyptian military aircraft. These assertions have been dismissed by those close to Kirk and the organization he founded. The lack of substantiation has led to a public invitation from Turning Point USA for Owens to join a livestream to address and debunk her claims.
Escalation of Conspiracy Theories
Since the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, during an event at Utah Valley University, various conspiracy theories have circulated online. Owens’ latest claim about the U.S. military marks an escalation in her narrative, which has progressively included more actors as earlier claims failed to gain traction. This pattern reflects a broader tendency within certain media ecosystems to construct complex plots without evidence, leading to reputational damage for those involved.
The narrative of a military operation, as suggested by Owens, aims to blur the lines between domestic and international actors, adding a layer of intrigue that captivates her audience. However, this approach not only lacks factual support but also risks further polarizing an already divided political landscape.
Who isn't she going to accuse?
Next, she will blame Trump?
Or God?
🙄
**
Candace Owens Drops Yet Another Charlie Kirk Conspiracy Theory: The U.S. Military Was ‘Involved’ https://t.co/AVIPvEGSef— Chuck Nellis The Phoenix (@ChuckThePhoenix) December 10, 2025
Turning Point USA’s Response
Turning Point USA has taken an unusually public stance against Owens, labeling her claims as slanderous and inviting her to discuss them in a livestream. This move underscores the strain her allegations have placed on Kirk’s associates and the organization. By challenging Owens publicly, Turning Point USA seeks to protect its reputation and assert control over the narrative surrounding Kirk’s death.
Frank Turek, a close associate of Kirk who was present during the assassination, has also refuted Owens’ claims. He emphasizes the importance of evidence-based discussions and warns against allowing baseless theories to overshadow the ongoing investigation into Kirk’s death.
Implications of the Conspiracy Theory
The implications of Owens’ conspiracy theory are significant, both for Turning Point USA and for the broader conservative movement. The allegations have caused emotional distress among Kirk’s colleagues, who have struggled to grieve amid ongoing rumors and accusations. For Owens, while these theories may boost short-term engagement, they could ultimately harm her credibility and relationships within the conservative community.
For the investigation into Kirk’s murder, the spread of conspiracy theories complicates efforts to pursue evidence-based inquiries. It highlights the challenges faced by law enforcement in maintaining public trust amid sensationalist narratives. As the situation unfolds, the need for clarity and factual integrity becomes increasingly critical.
